Download Comparison between Japan and US trends in economics-demographics-health and education PowerPoint Presentation


Login   OR  Register

Iframe embed code :

Presentation url :


Description :

This study investigates if Japan is a good proxy for the US in terms of prospective trends in economics, demographics, health, and education. As the study conveys, in some cases it is (declining fertility rate, population aging). In some other areas, the disparity between the two countries is likely to remain (health and education).

Tags :

Japan | US | international economics | demographics | health | education | economics | us economic | japan economic | future economic

Home / Science & Technology / Science & Technology Presentations / Comparison between Japan and US trends in economics-demographics-health and education PowerPoint Presentation

Comparison between Japan and US trends in economics-demographics-health and education PowerPoint Presentation

Ppt Presentation Embed Code   Zoom Ppt Presentation

PowerPoint is the world's most popular presentation software which can let you create professional Comparison between Japan and US trends in economics-demographics-health and education powerpoint presentation easily and in no time. This helps you give your presentation on Comparison between Japan and US trends in economics-demographics-health and education in a conference, a school lecture, a business proposal, in a webinar and business and professional representations.

The uploader spent his/her valuable time to create this Comparison between Japan and US trends in economics-demographics-health and education powerpoint presentation slides, to share his/her useful content with the world. This ppt presentation uploaded by gaetan in Science & Technology ppt presentation category is available for free download,and can be used according to your industries like finance, marketing, education, health and many more.

About This Presentation

Comparison between Japan and US trends in economics-demographics-health and education Presentation Transcript

Slide 1 - Japan’s Present = US Future? To figure out where the US is heading in terms of economic & demographic growth, and Government policies it is informative to look at the contemporary situation in Japan. At times, the relevant trends do appear to converge with a lag (US lagging behind Japan). In other areas such as health and education, the two countries are very divergent. Gaetan Lion, November 16, 2021
Slide 2 - Demographic section 2
Slide 3 - Notice that both countries’ fertility rate has been much below replacement rate (green line at 2.1 child per woman) for several years for the US and several decades for Japan. The US fertility rate at 1.71 in 2019 is very close to Japan at 1.72 back in 1986. Japan’s fertility rate in 2019 is 1.36. The US fertility rate has dropped from 2.12 in 2007 to 1.71 in 2019. If current trend continues, the U.S. fertility rate could very well reach Japan’s current level within a couple of decades. Source: World Bank 3 US Japan
Slide 4 - The US population growth rate in 2020 based on a 10 year CAGR was 0.8%; the same as Japan was in 1985. Japan’s population growth rate, as specified, was flat starting in 2012 and became negative in 2016. The US population growth rate, as specified was 1.6% in 2001 and 0.8% in 2020. Source: World Bank 4 US Japan
Slide 5 - Old Age Dependency Ratio (> 64/15-64) 5 Japan’s society has aged very rapidly since the early 1980s. The US appears to be on a similar aging path around 2010. And, the US aging trend as defined by this Old Age Dependency Ratio is accelerating. By mid- or late-century, the US Old Age Dependency Ratio may well approach Japan’s current levels. Japan US Gray areas denote US recessions
Slide 6 - Age Dependency Ratio ( < 15 + > 64)/(15 – 64) 6 The current Age Dependency Ratio (< 15 + > 64)/(15 – 64) is around 55% for the US and 70% for Japan. The US mentioned ratio is expected to reach Japan’s current level by 2070, according to the United Nations – Population Division. US Japan
Slide 7 - 7 Population by Age Group Looking at population by age group over time, the US population age group mix in 2020 is similar to Japan’s in mid 90s (red vertical dashed line) . Japan’s population aging after the mid 90s accelerated (mixture of rising life span, declining fertility rate). We can expect the US population to continue aging, but not as rapidly as Japan because of declining US health trends (rising BMI, etc.) and the US higher net immigration rate. US Japan
Slide 8 - Life Expectancy 8 Japan US In 1965, both countries had a life expectancy of 70 years. By 2019, Japan’s life expectancy had risen to 84.35 years and the US to 78.78 years (same as Japan in 1989). Gray areas denote US recessions
Slide 9 - Population growth projections 9 Japan US Population projections reflect the impact of ongoing population aging, lower fertility rates, and differential in net migration rates. In 2020, Japan’s population has already peaked and is starting to decline. Notice the already very rapid decline in Japan’s youth population (< 15, and < 5). For the US, the slow down in population growth is not that pronounced. Out to 2100, the US population is still expecting to continue rising, albeit at a much lower speed. Notice the rather flat trend in US youth population growth.
Slide 10 - Net migration 10 Japan US The main reason the US population growth is not slowing down as rapidly as Japan’s is the US far higher net migration. Net migration to the US amounts to around 5 million individuals coming into the country every year vs only 500,000 for Japan. This corresponds to a boost in yearly population growth of about 1.5% for the US vs. only 0.4% for Japan. Gray areas denote US recessions
Slide 11 - 11 Population growth is result of fertility rate and net migration rate Combining a fertility rate of 1.4 with a net positive migration per annum of 0.5%, assuming a generation has a length of 30 years, results in a yearly change in population of – 0.8%. That is pretty much where Japan is heading (red cell). The US situation is associated with a fertility rate of 1.7 with a net positive migration of 1.5% resulting in a yearly change in population of + 0.8%. If we assume the generation length to be 25 years. The mentioned yearly change in population decreases to – 1.1% for Japan and + 0.6% for the US. This framework pretty much explains the respective population projections shown earlier.
Slide 12 - Economics section 12
Slide 13 - The explanatory commentary for this slide is very similar to the one on the previous slide. The main difference is that the US economic growth is still quite a bit faster than Japan’s. And, this is due to the US population growth rate being higher than Japan’s because of the the US much higher positive net immigration. As the US population growth rate keeps on declining, its economic growth rate will also decline. However, it may always lag behind the steeper decline in Japan’s economic growth rate. 13 Source: World Bank, OECD Japan US
Slide 14 - 14 US Japan
Slide 15 - Investment/GDP 15 The two measures are not entirely comparable. And, the data for Japan was unavailable after 2010. Over the reviewed years, accepting the data caveats it appears that Japan’s investment to GDP was much higher than in the US. I understand that in more recent years, this gap has narrowed materially. US Japan Gray areas denote US recessions
Slide 16 - 16 US Japan
Slide 17 - 17 US Japan Growth rate of real GDP per employed person is again different between the two countries. Over the reviewed period, the Japanese measure is far more volatile. It is not unlikely that in the near future, the two countries will converge somewhat on such measures.
Slide 18 - Labor Productivity 18 Japan US The two countries’ respective changes in labor productivity are different. At times, the two time series seem negatively correlated. Nevertheless, notice how during US recessions (gray areas), Japan’s labor productivity drops a lot more than the US. This is especially the case during the three most recent recessions. Gray areas denote US recessions
Slide 19 - 19 US Japan
Slide 20 - Source: World Bank, OECD Both countries have experienced a long term decline in constant GDP per capita growth rate. Japan’s decline has been more pronounced because in the early years, Japan was still in a post WWII catch-up economic boom mode, which phased out over time. Additionally, Japan experienced the pop of the Japan’s Bubble (stock market and real estate) in the late 1980s to early 1990s which further accelerated the decline in constant GDP per capita growth rate. As shown, the current respective growth rates of both countries have already converged much after the Great Recession. The US mentioned growth rate is only marginally higher than Japan’s. 20 US Japan
Slide 21 - 21 Source: International Federation of Robotics Japan is one of the World leaders in robotization. Notice that its number of robots installed per 10,000 employees is close to 60% greater than in the US. Between 217 and 2019, Japan has increased its robot installation by 18% compared to 14% for the US. Robotization is a viable way for Japan to partly overcome its prospective decline in labor force over the next several decades. And, it may contribute to Japan’s GDP per capita growth.
Slide 22 - RGDP & RGDP p.c. CAGR forecasts over 2020 - 2060 22 US GDP is anticipated to grow much faster than Japan because of much faster population growth due to its higher net migration rate that compensates for a fertility rate much below replacement rate. When scaling economic growth on a per capita basis, Japan is expected to grow faster than the US. This is due to Japan’s decreasing population (lowering the denominator) and potentially its higher level of robotization.
Slide 23 - Monetary policy section 23
Slide 24 - 24 The Federal Reserve Bank Quantitative Easing (QE) activity whereby the Fed buys a huge amount of securities (Treasuries, MBS) to inject liquidity in the financial system, lower long term interest rates, and stimulate the economy is a very recent phenomenon. Between 1970 and the early 2000s, the Fed had managed the economy without any QE activity. And, the Fed’s balance sheet remained steadily between 5% to 7% of GDP (upper chart). Over this period, the US economy had experienced numerous severe downturns associated with several oil shocks, stagflation, Y2K, etc. (see lower chart gray areas). Starting with the Great Recession in late 2007, the Fed implemented massive QE activity on an unprecedented scale. During the Great Recession, the mentioned QE activities caused the Fed’s balance sheet to nearly triple from just above 5% to over 15% of GDP. During the COVID Recession, the Fed abruptly increased its balance sheet (through QE activities) from 20% to over 35% of GDP. Gray areas denote US recessions
Slide 25 - QE Activity. Japan vs. US 25 Source: FRED, Federal Reserve, Bank of Japan The Bank of Japan (BOJ) was a pioneer in mounting huge QE activities. The BOJ assets level already represented over 15% of GDP back in 1998. The US Federal Reserve will only reach that level in early 2009 during the Great Recession. Within the US, the recent bump up to 35% of GDP during the COVID Recession seemed like a giant leap. However, this QE effort is dwarfed by the ongoing BOJ QE activities mounted since the Great Recession. BOJ assets currently represent a staggering 132% of GDP vs. 34% for the US Fed. Japan US
Slide 26 - Central Bank Policy Rate 26 Japan US The BOJ was also a pioneer in setting policy interest rates close to 0%. They have been at that level since 1995. The Fed only implemented such low rates in 2009 during the Great Recession. Gray areas denote US recessions
Slide 27 - Monetary policy considerations 27 The Federal Reserve QE interventions have reached ever rising and unprecedented scale since the Great Recession. Yet, their respective scale appears diminutive vs. Japan. Nevertheless, the Japan ongoing very large QE efforts have not contributed to inflation. The most recent figures indicate that Japan’s inflation has remained pretty much flat over the past 12 months at + 0.2%. Meanwhile, in the US inflation has surged by 6.2% over the same period (Source: The Economist issue of November 13th – 19th, 2021).
Slide 28 - Fiscal policy section 28
Slide 29 - US Budget Deficit as % of GDP 29 Gray areas denote US recessions Since the aftermath of the Dot.com Bubble recession in the early 2000s, the following recessions have steadily resulted in massive increase in fiscal stimulus associated with ever larger Budget Deficits (as a % of GDP).
Slide 30 - Budget Deficit comparison: Japan vs. US 30 Japan US Gray areas denote US recessions Even though the Japanese data is incomplete, it again denotes that Japanese fiscal stimulus undertaking have often been far larger than the US.
Slide 31 - Central Government Debt/GDP 31 US Japan Source: IMF The two countries had the same level of Central Government Debt/GDP in the early 1990s. Since then, Japan’s ratio has more than tripled to 200%. Meanwhile, the US more than doubled from just above 40% before the Great Recession to over 90% in 2019. My understanding is that most recent US data would indicate that this ratio is now much above 100%.
Slide 32 - 32 General Government Debt/GDP Japan US Source: IMF Directionally, same comment as on the previous slide. Notice that the most recent data disclosed by the IMF is as of 2019. If updated to 2021, both ratios would be substantially higher.
Slide 33 - Fiscal policy considerations 33 Since the Great Recession, the US Government has embarked on an ever rapidly increasing debt leveraging with increasing Budget Deficits even during economic expansions (relative to earlier expansions), resulting in ever increasing Public Debt/GDP. Given current legislation passed regarding ongoing fiscal stimuli in the $trillions, both ongoing Budget Deficits and Public Debt/GDP ratios are likely to continue rising rapidly over the next few years. However, when we compare the US public debt leveraging with Japan, the former is dwarfed by the latter. Nevertheless, the Japan ongoing very large fiscal stimulus and debt leveraging has not contributed to inflation. The most recent figures indicate that Japan’s inflation has remained pretty much flat over the past 12 months at + 0.2%. Meanwhile, in the US inflation has surged by 6.2% over the same period (Source: The Economist issue of November 13th – 19th, 2021).
Slide 34 - Health section 34
Slide 35 - 35 Source: OECD US $10,900 per year Japan $4,700 per year
Slide 36 - 36 Source: OECD Japan 11% of GDP US 16.8% of GDP
Slide 37 - 37 Source: OECD Japan $810 US $1,380
Slide 38 - 38 BMI = > 25 Japan 27.5% US 73% Source: OECD
Slide 39 - 39 Obesity rate among adults: Japan 3.7% US 38.2%
Slide 40 - 40 Source: OECD Japan 16 days at hospital US 5.5 days at hospital
Slide 41 - 41
Slide 42 - 42 The US costs are inflated because they include cost of hospital, administrative, physician, and diagnostic procedure. Meanwhile for the other countries, the costs only include the cost of the procedure. But, even if we multiplied Japan’s costs as specified by 4 times, in most cases, they still would be a lot lower than the US ones.
Slide 43 - 43 Source: Fropky.com US consumption of soft drink p.c. = 10 x Japan’s!
Slide 44 - 44 Source: Fropky.com US TV watching is more than 2 x Japan’s.
Slide 45 - 45 Source: Fropky.com, daitips.com School year: 210 days School year: 180 days * World Data sources: the intelligence quotients by countries are taken from the studies conducted by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen (2002), Heiner Rindermann (2007), Khaleefa and Lynn (2008), Ahmad, Khanum and Riaz (2008), Lynn, Abdalla and Al-Shahomee (2008), Lynn and Meisenberg (2010), as well as the PISA tests in 2003, 2006, and 2009. More recent results were weighted higher.
Slide 46 - 46 Obesity Rate Japan 3.7% US 38.2% Life Expectancy Japan 84.4 US 78.8 Health Care Cost Japan 11% of GDP US 16.8% of GDP An intriguing Causal Model Causal variable Causal variable School Year Japan 210 days US 180 days Causal variable RGDP p.c. forecast Japan 1.8% US 1.4%
Slide 47 - Health considerations 47 It is unclear how the US could ever bridge the vast difference in lifestyle, nutrition, overall health status, and life expectancy with Japan. In combination those factors contribute directly to much higher health care costs for the US relative to Japan. Additionally, health care costs in the US are further boosted by malpractice liabilities, for profit industry structure, and ill conceived regulations (i.e. US Medicare not allowed to negotiate lower drug prices).
Slide 48 - Education section 48
Slide 49 - 49 Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) (15 years old) Japan US Japan Japan US US Over time, reading scores between Japan and the US are not so far apart. Japan’s are just a lot more volatile. On the other hand, in both math and science, Japan performs well above the US and the OECD average. Meanwhile, the US is below the OECD average in math, and just about at the OECD average in science. Regarding those PISA country scores, one could advance the respective average IQ of the countries plays a role. As we will see in the following slides, the standard deviation of IQ may be an underlying confounding variable that is also influential on the shown outcomes.
Slide 50 - 50 Source: American Institute of Physics, National Science Board Japan US These figures should be adjusted for respective countries’ population size. Nevertheless, we can see that over the reviewed period, the US is experiencing a reasonably rapid upward trend from 500K to around 750K degrees. Meanwhile, Japan’s trend is actually slightly downward. Adjusted for population size, Japan’s figures would still be higher than the US. But, if current trends continue, it would not be the case for long.
Slide 51 - 51 Source: American Institute of Physics, National Science Board US total US temporary visa US citizens and permanent residents Japan Even if we adjusted the figures for population size, the US (during most recent years) would be faring better than Japan on this one count.
Slide 52 - 52 Source: American Institute of Physics, National Science Board On this count to, the US is faring well relative to Japan. Remember the consideration between average IQ and its standard deviation. It seems to be playing out here.
Slide 53 - 53 Source: The Center for World University Ranking (CWUR), 2021- 2022 edition Among the top 20 universities in the World: US 16 Japan 1
Slide 54 - 54 Source: The Center for World University Ranking (CWUR), 2021- 2022 edition Among top 10 universities in Japan, only 2 are in the top 50 in the World. Top 10 universities in Japan
Slide 55 - 55 The top 10 universities in US all rank among the top 12 in the World. Source: The Center for World University Ranking (CWUR), 2021- 2022 edition Top 10 universities in US
Slide 56 - Education considerations 56 Japan’s primary education performance is far superior to the US, and is likely to remain so. The US primary school system is unlikely to ever bridge the gap in school year-days (180 in US vs. 210 in Japan). Also, qualitative factors we have not explored like rigor in math and science curricula are likely to remain a differentiating factor between the two countries. At the university level, it appears the roles are reversed with top US universities being far superior to Japanese ones. And, the US comparing favorably in the number of university degrees conferred in science and engineering, and in the number of publications within those same fields. It seems like an ideal education path would be for one to grow up in Japan to get a world class primary education. And, then to emigrate to the US to go to university. Apparently, many top Asian students (Japan, China, India) follow a similar path. And, they contribute to the number of science and engineering degrees and published articles in the US.