Download About Lymphomas PowerPoint Presentation

Login   OR  Register

Share on Social Media


Home / Health & Wellness / Health & Wellness Presentations / About Lymphomas PowerPoint Presentation

About Lymphomas PowerPoint Presentation

slidesfinder By : slidesfinder

On : Feb 24, 2014

facebook   twitter   google plus  
In : Health & Wellness

Embed :

Login / Signup - with account for

  • → Make favorite
  • → Flag as inappropriate
  • → Download Presentation
  • → Share Presentation
  • Slide 1 - Lymphomas: The Basics Brad Kahl, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Director, UW Lymphoma Service
  • Slide 2 - Lymphomas: NHL vs Hodgkin’s EPIDEMIOLOGY Biology Classification Approach to the Patient
  • Slide 3 - Hodgkin’s Disease Epidemiology 14% of malignant lymphomas 0.5% of all malignancies approximately 8000 new cases/yr in US approximately 1500 deaths/yr over past 30 years age adjusted incidence rates declined appreciably mortality rates declined substantially
  • Slide 4 - Hodgkin’s Disease Epidemiology men > women whites > blacks > Asians no clear risk factors, several implicated EBV (pathogen or passenger) HIV woodworking, farming rare familial aggregations
  • Slide 5 - NHL: Epidemiology Most common hematologic malignancy 60,000 new cases annually 6th leading cause of cancer death incidence rising overall incidence up by 73% since 1973 “epidemic” 2nd most rapidly rising malignancy
  • Slide 6 - NHL: Epidemiology Why the increase? Increase noted mostly in farming states MN #1, WI #7 NHL incidence possible role of herbicides, insecticides, etc. Other environmental factors?
  • Slide 7 - NHL: Epidemiology Other risk factors immunodeficiency states AIDS, post-transplant, genetic autoimmune diseases Sjogrens Sprue infections H. pylori, EBV, HHV-8
  • Slide 8 - Epidemiology SEER 5 year survival data NHL Hodgkin’s 1974-76: 47.2 71.1% 1977-79: 48.1 73.0% 1980-82: 51.1 74.3% 1983-90 52.0 78.9%
  • Slide 9 - Hodgkin’s Disease Epidemiology BIOLOGY Classification Approach to the Patient
  • Slide 10 - Hodgkin’s Disease Background first described in 1832 by Dr. Thomas Hodgkin characterized by the presence of Reed-Sternberg cells multinucleated giant cells described by Sternberg in 1898 and Reed in 1902 classified as an infectious disease until 1950’s
  • Slide 11 - Reed-Sternberg Cell
  • Slide 12 - Hodgkin Biology RS is a “crippled” germinal center B cell does not have normal B cell surface antigens micromanipulation of single RS followed by PCR demonstrates clonally rearranged, but non functional immunoglobulin genes somatic mutations result in stop codon (no sIg) no apoptotic death malignant transformation unclear how this occurs; ? EBV unclear how cells end up with RS phenotype
  • Slide 13 - Hodgkin’s Disease Epidemiology Biology CLASSIFICATION APPROACH TO THE PATIENT
  • Slide 14 - Hodgkin Lymphoma Classification “Classic” Hodgkin’s Disease nodular sclerosis mixed cellularity lymphocyte depleted (very rare) classical lymphocyte rich HRS cells CD30 and CD15 positive nodular lymphocyte predominant HRS cells (L&H cells) have B cell markers CD 20 and surface Immunoglobulin
  • Slide 15 - Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • Slide 16 - Nodular Sclerosing Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • Slide 17 - Approach to the Patient Hodgkin’s Disease approach dictated mainly by where the disease is located rather (results of staging) than the exact histologic subtype NHL approach is dictated mainly by the histologic subtype rather than the results of staging
  • Slide 18 - Hodgkin’s Disease Approach to the Patient staging evaluation H & P CBC, diff, plts ESR, LDH, albumin, LFT’s, Cr CT scans chest/abd/pelvis bone marrow evaluation **PET or gallium scan** **lymphangiogram or laparotomy**
  • Slide 19 - Ann Arbor Staging System Stage I: single lymph node region (I) or single extralymphatic organ or site (IE) Stage II: > 2 lymph node regions on same side of diaphragm (II) or with limited, contiguous extra lymphatic tissue involvement (IIE) Stage III: both sides of diaphragm involved, may include spleen (IIIS) or local tissue involvement (IIIE) Stage IV: multiple/disseminated foci involved with > 1 extralymphatic organs (i.e. bone marrow) (A) or (B) designates absence/presence of “B” symptoms
  • Slide 20 - Ann Arbor Staging System for Hodgkin's Disease and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV Reprinted with permission. Adapted from Skarin. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Atlas of Diagnostic Oncology. 1991.
  • Slide 21 - Modified Ann Arbor Staging “E” designation for extranodal disease B symptoms recurrent drenching night sweats during previous month unexplained, persistent, or recurrent fever with temps above 38 C during the previous month unexplained weight loss of more than 10% of the body weight during the previous 6 months Criteria for bulk 10 cm nodal mass mediastinal mass > 1/3 thorax diameter
  • Slide 22 - ppt slide no 22 content not found
  • Slide 23 - Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment approach depends upon stage, prognostic factors, and co-morbidities Stage I-II consider XRT, chemotherapy, or combined therapy Bulky stage I-II combined modality therapy Stage III-IV ABVD x 6-8 cycles gold standard
  • Slide 24 - Hodgkin Lymphoma Adverse prognostic features for stage I & II (EORTC data) more than 3 nodal sites bulky adenopathy ESR > 50 B symptoms invasion into critical organs male age > 40 MC or LD subtype should probably not receive XRT alone if any of the above present (excessive relapse rate)
  • Slide 25 - Hodgkin Lymphoma Independent adverse prognostic factors advanced stage (III-IV) male sex age > 45 albumin < 4 gm/dl HgB < 10.5 mg/dl stage IV disease WBC count > 15,000/mm3 lymphocyte count < 600/mm3 (Hasenclever et al, NEJM 339,1506-1514;1998)
  • Slide 26 - Hodgkin’s Disease Role for Stem Cell Transplantation clinical trials show benefit for patients who receive high dose chemotherapy followed by SCT for patients who have relapsed after initial therapy or for patients are primary refractory
  • Slide 27 - Hodgkin’s Disease Results of Treatment stage 5 year overall survival I 90% II 90% III 80% IV 65%
  • Slide 28 - Hodgkin Lymphoma Late Complications depends upon treatment modality utilized XRT vs. MOPP vs. ABVD vs. CMT issues depends upon the age of patient relative risks higher in younger patients absolute risks higher in older patients major focus of current clinical trials to to maintain high cure rate while minimizing late complication shorter courses of chemotherapy with lower radiation doses in smaller fields elimination of radiotherapy
  • Slide 29 - Hodgkin’s: future directions Limited stage and good prognosis advanced stage cure rate high current goal is to minimize late complications trials looking at CMT with less chemotherapy and less radiation Advanced stage cure rate around 50-70% trial comparing ABVD to Stanford V Clinical Trials
  • Slide 30 - NHL Epidemiology BIOLOGY Classification Approach to the Patient
  • Slide 31 - Lymphoma Biology Indolent vs. Aggressive NHL key principle in understanding biology, and approach to the patient Indolent = incurable Aggressive = curable WHY? Chromosomal Abnormalities in NHL frequent chromosomal translocations into Ig gene loci t(8;14), t(2;8), t(8;22) Burkitt’s t(14;18) follicular NHL
  • Slide 32 - Lymphoma Biology Aggressive NHL short natural history (patients die within months if untreated) disease of rapid cellular proliferation Indolent NHL long natural history (patients can live for many years untreated) disease of slow cellular accumulation
  • Slide 33 - NHL Epidemiology Biology CLASSIFICATION Approach to the Patient
  • Slide 34 - NHL: Classification Historically- a mess 1940s Gail and Mallory 1950s Rappaport 1970s Lukes-Collins 1970s Kiel 1982 Working 1994 REAL 1999 WHO
  • Slide 35 - ppt slide no 35 content not found
  • Slide 36 - NHL: Classification Key Points cell size: small cell vs. large cell nodal architecture: follicular vs. diffuse Principle More aggressive: diffuse, large cell More indolent: follicular, small cell
  • Slide 37 - NHL: Classification Terminology (refers to natural history) low grade = indolent intermediate grade = aggressive high grade = aggressive Principle indolent: slow growing, incurable aggressive: rapidly growing, curable
  • Slide 38 - NHL Epidemiology Biology Classification APPROACH TO THE PATIENT
  • Slide 39 - NHL: Approach to the Patient Approach dictated mainly by histology reliable hematopathology crucial Approach also influenced by: stage prognostic factors co-morbidities
  • Slide 40 - NHL: Approach to the Patient Staging evaluation History and PE Routine blood work CBC, diff, plts, electrolytes, BUN, Cr, LFT’s, uric acid, LDH, B2M CT scans chest/abd/pelvis Bone marrow evaluation Other studies as indicated (lumbar puncture, gallium, etc…)
  • Slide 41 - ppt slide no 41 content not found
  • Slide 42 - NHL: Approach to the Patient Indolent NHL: typical scenario patient presents with painless adenopathy otherwise asymptomatic follicular small cell histology average age 59 usually stage III-IV at diagnosis
  • Slide 43 - ppt slide no 43 content not found
  • Slide 44 - ppt slide no 44 content not found
  • Slide 45 - NHL: Approach to the Patient Indolent NHL: guiding treatment principle early treatment does not prolong overall survival When to treat? constitutional symptoms compromise of a vital organ by compression or infiltration, particularly the bone marrow bulky adenopathy rapid progression evidence of transformation
  • Slide 46 - NHL: Approach to the Patient Indolent NHL: typical scenario watchful waiting: 2-4 years first remission length: 3-4 years second remission: 2-3 years third remission: 1-2 years each subsequent remission shorter than prior median survival 8-12 years for FLSC
  • Slide 47 - NHL: Approach to the Patient Indolent NHL: treatment options watchful waiting radiation to involved fields single agent chemotherapy chlorambucil + prednisone, fludarabine combination chemotherapy CVP, CF, FND, CHOP chemotherapy + interferon chemotherapy + monoclonal antibodies monoclonal antibodies radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies stem cell transplantation
  • Slide 48 - NHL: Approach to the Patient Aggressive NHL: typical scenario patients notes B symptoms of several weeks duration work-up reveals pathologic adenopathy histology: diffuse large cell lymphoma about 50% patients stage I-II, 50% stage III-IV average age 64 IPI score
  • Slide 49 - ppt slide no 49 content not found
  • Slide 50 - ppt slide no 50 content not found
  • Slide 51 - NHL: Approach to the Patient Aggressive NHL: treatment approach Stage I-II: combined modality therapy CHOP chemotherapy x 3 + IF radiotherapy cure rate around 70% Stage III-IV (also bulky stage II) (R)CHOP chemotherapy x 6-8 cycles cure rate around 40% (R)CHOP is the standard
  • Slide 52 - NHL: Approach to the Patient International Prognostic Index Risk Factors (0-5) age > 60 two or more extranodal sites performance status > 2 elevated LDH stage III-IV Age adjusted IPI (0-3)
  • Slide 53 - CR and OS stratified by IPI
  • Slide 54 - NHL: Approach to the Patient Is CHOP the best we can do? R-CHOP may be better National Trials opening looking at alternative strategies in poor prognosis DLCL age adjusted IPI > 2 CHOP vs. CHOP + SCT Risk stratification is the current trend in NHL Sorting out role for stem cell transplantation Sorting out role for innovative combinations
  • Slide 55 - NHL: Approach to the Patient Role for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Aggressive NHL clear benefit when used for aggressive NHL in first relapse in appropriately selected patients 1/3 of these patients can be cured by SCT Indolent NHL no indication that patients are cured no indication that OS is prolonged
  • Slide 56 - NHL: future directions Indolent monoclonal antibodies (Rituximab) radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies chemotherapy combined with antibodies antibodies combined with immunomodulators Aggressive risk stratification CHOP vs. CHOP plus SCT chemotherapy plus antibodies Clinical Trials
  • Slide 57 - Summary NHL incidence increasing, Hodgkin’s decreasing Hodgkin’s cure rate quite high approach is dictated mainly by disease stage NHL cure rate mediocre approach is dictated mainly by histologic subtype indolent vs. aggressive indolent: watchful waiting perfectly acceptable for asymptomatic patients aggressive: require aggressive treatment ASAP to achieve cure
  • Slide 58 - Lymphoma Clinic Multidisciplinary radiotherapy-Dr. Scott Tannehill hematopathology-Dr. Catherine Leith Emphasis on clinical trials formal testing of promising new therapies Every Wednesday Clinic phone #: 608-263-7022

Description : Available About Lymphomas powerpoint presentation for free download which is uploaded by honey an active user in belonging ppt presentation Health & Wellness category.

Tags : About Lymphomas